
Photo by Innerbody Research
Ultraviolet (UV) exposure may be responsible for as much as 80% of visible facial aging, contributing to wrinkles, uneven pigmentation, and changes in skin texture.1 One way UV light causes this damage is by generating reactive oxygen species — unstable molecules that can damage collagen and other structures in your skin.
Antioxidants help neutralize these molecules, which has made them increasingly popular in both skin care products and supplements. But “antioxidant” covers a huge range of ingredients, and the evidence behind them varies considerably. So how do you know which antioxidants actually work, which ones make sense for your skin, or whether they're worth using at all?
In this guide, we examine which antioxidants have the strongest evidence for skin health and compare the best topical and oral options to help you find the right approach for your goals.
If you want the short version, here’s where our research led us:
Before getting into specific products, it helps to know that antioxidants for skin generally fall into two categories: topical antioxidants, which you apply directly to your skin, and oral antioxidants, which you get through food or supplements.
Research supports both approaches, but they aren't interchangeable. Topical vitamin C has particularly strong evidence for protecting skin from oxidative damage and supporting collagen. Oral antioxidants don't have the same depth of evidence in these areas, but some have shown benefits for measures such as UV resilience, hydration, and elasticity. Neither approach replaces sunscreen.
Based on the available evidence, these are our top picks:
Over the past two decades, Innerbody Research has helped tens of millions of readers make more informed decisions about staying healthy and living healthier lifestyles.
For this guide, we reviewed nearly 100 clinical studies, medical reviews, and research papers examining how antioxidants may affect skin health, including their potential effects on photoaging, hydration, elasticity, and other signs of skin aging. We also explored both the skin care and supplement markets to identify products that align with the available research and meet high standards for quality and transparency.
Alongside our research, we purchased and personally used several of the most promising products to evaluate factors like ease of use, packaging, application, and the overall customer experience.
Additionally, like all health-related content on this website, this guide was thoroughly vetted by one or more members of our Medical Review Board for accuracy and will continue to be monitored for updates by our editorial team.
We evaluated the best antioxidants for skin based on four factors that matter most when choosing a product:
These criteria guided our analysis across the topical products and oral supplements included in this guide.
In the sections ahead, we explain how each of our top picks performed in these areas and where certain products stood out. All of our recommendations met a high standard overall; when we highlight an “advantage,” it doesn’t mean the other products performed poorly, only that a product demonstrated a distinct strength in that category.
Advantage: SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic
Comparing antioxidants for skin isn't quite as simple as comparing five versions of the same ingredient. Our recommendations include both topical products and oral supplements, and studies have looked at everything from wrinkles and elasticity to pigmentation and protection against UV-related damage.
So, when evaluating effectiveness, we focused primarily on:
SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic has an unusually strong case on all three fronts. Vitamin C is the key antioxidant in its formula, and it has a substantial base of clinical evidence for skin. A 2023 systematic review of seven clinical studies found that topical vitamin C improved wrinkling and pigmentation.2
Pairing vitamin C with other antioxidants may offer additional benefits. Research has found that adding ferulic acid to vitamins C and E can improve their stability and increase protection against UV-related skin damage.4 And SkinCeuticals has an advantage that similar serums like Maelove Glow Maker don't: C E Ferulic itself has been tested in humans. In a small clinical trial, the product's 15% L-ascorbic acid, 1% vitamin E, and 0.5% ferulic acid formula significantly reduced several measures of skin damage following simulated UV exposure.3 That direct product testing gives us more confidence in SkinCeuticals' effectiveness than we have for similar formulas that haven't undergone clinical testing.
There is an important caveat. That trial was supported by a grant from SkinCeuticals-L'Oréal, and one of its authors, SkinCeuticals founding scientist Sheldon Pinnell, was a consultant for the company. Industry funding doesn't invalidate the results, but it gives us reason to interpret them with some additional caution. Still, there's real value in having clinical evidence on the core antioxidant formula used in the product, rather than having to assume that research on similar ingredients will translate to a particular formula.
CocoaVia has good evidence behind it, too. In a 24-week randomized controlled trial, women consuming 320mg of cocoa flavanols daily experienced improvements in facial wrinkles and skin elasticity compared with placebo.5 That's strong evidence for an oral option, but SkinCeuticals' combination of broader vitamin C research and clinical testing of the three-antioxidant formula at the heart of C E Ferulic gives it the edge here.
Advantage: Vanicream Vitamin C Serum
All of our recommendations have relatively favorable safety profiles, but topical antioxidants have an advantage in one important respect: they're applied directly to the skin rather than taken orally. That generally limits systemic exposure and makes concerns such as drug interactions less relevant. With topicals, the more immediate concern is usually skin irritation.
That's where Vanicream stands out. SkinCeuticals and Maelove both use L-ascorbic acid, the best-studied form of topical vitamin C but one that generally needs an acidic formula to penetrate the skin effectively. These formulas can cause stinging, redness, or irritation, particularly if you have sensitive skin.6
Vanicream instead uses tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate (THD ascorbate), a vitamin C derivative that doesn't require the same low-pH environment. It also avoids fragrance, dyes, essential oils, and botanical extracts, reducing some additional potential sources of irritation.
There is a tradeoff: THD ascorbate hasn't been studied nearly as extensively as L-ascorbic acid. That's one reason SkinCeuticals has our effectiveness advantage. But from a safety and tolerability standpoint, Vanicream combines the generally lower systemic exposure of a topical product with a formula specifically designed to be gentle on sensitive skin, giving it the edge here.
Advantage: Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+
Comparing costs gets a little tricky; some of our recommendations are supplements with fixed serving sizes, and others are serums whose lifespan depends on how much you apply. To make the comparison more useful, we looked at both upfront prices and approximate costs per use.
| Type | Price | Estimated uses/servings | Approx. cost per use | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CocoaVia Cocoa Flavanols | Oral | $48.99 | 30 | $1.63 |
| Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+ | Oral | $28 | 30 | $0.93 |
| SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic | Topical | $185 | 120-150 | $1.23-$1.54 |
| Maelove Glow Maker | Topical | $32.95 | 120-200 | $0.16-$0.27 |
| Vanicream Vitamin C Serum | Topical | $17.97 | 117-175 | $0.10-$0.15 |
Editor’s note: Topical uses and costs per use are estimates based on typical application amounts; actual usage will vary.
Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+ isn't the cheapest product in our guide, but it gives you a lot for your money. Each $28 bottle provides 30 one-capsule servings, with three antioxidants — astaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin — at doses that align well with amounts used in human research.
Its subscription program makes the value even better. A monthly subscription lowers the price to about $24, while buying six months at a time brings it down to $21 per bottle, or about $0.70 per daily serving.
Maelove is also an excellent value if you're specifically looking for a topical antioxidant. Its formula uses the same concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E, and ferulic acid as SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic, but at a fraction of the price. For readers focused on keeping the cost of their skin care routine down, it's an especially compelling alternative.
Advantage: Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+
Our oral recommendations have a natural convenience advantage over topical serums: you don't need to work them into a skin care routine, apply them evenly, or wait for one product to absorb before layering on the next. And between our two oral picks, Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+ is especially easy to use.
Astaxanthin+ requires just one softgel per day, compared with two capsules for CocoaVia's 500mg daily serving. Innerbody Labs also offers subscriptions every one, three, or six months, giving you plenty of flexibility over how often you want supplements delivered.
CocoaVia comes very close, though. You can subscribe for deliveries every one or two months, and its return policy gives you considerably more time to decide whether the product works for you. CocoaVia gives you 100 days to return the unused portion for a refund, while Innerbody Labs accepts opened products but requires you to initiate your return within 30 days of receiving your order. With either company, you're responsible for return shipping.
For us, the simplicity of one softgel per day and the wider range of subscription intervals give Astaxanthin+ a slight convenience advantage. But if having plenty of time to try a product before committing matters more to you, CocoaVia's 100-day guarantee is a meaningful perk.
Here’s a quick breakdown of how our top picks compare in terms of cost, daily use, and other key factors.
Antioxidants are substances that help protect cells from oxidative stress. Your body produces some antioxidants on its own, while others — including vitamins C and E, carotenoids, and various plant compounds — come from your diet or products you use on your skin.7
To understand why that matters for skin, it helps to know about reactive oxygen species (ROS). These unstable molecules are produced naturally in the body, but their levels can also rise in response to things your skin encounters every day, particularly UV radiation and air pollution.8 ROS aren't inherently bad — they play roles in normal cellular processes — but too many can overwhelm your body's antioxidant defenses. That imbalance is known as oxidative stress.7
In the skin, oxidative stress can damage proteins, fats, and DNA, contributing to inflammation. It can also affect collagen and activate enzymes that break it down, providing one of the links between UV exposure, oxidative stress, and visible signs of skin aging such as wrinkles and loss of elasticity.8 9
Your skin already has its own antioxidant defense system, including enzymes and compounds such as vitamin C, vitamin E, and glutathione.7 But environmental exposures can put additional pressure on those defenses. That's where antioxidants from outside the body become interesting. Through your diet, supplements, or products applied directly to your skin, certain antioxidants may help reinforce these defenses and provide additional protection against oxidative damage.10 How well they work — and what benefits they provide — depends considerably on the specific antioxidant and how it reaches your skin.
There are two main ways to get additional antioxidants to your skin: applying them directly or consuming them through food or supplements. Each route works a little differently and comes with its own advantages and limitations.
Topical antioxidants are applied directly to the skin, allowing them to act where you put them. This can be useful for targeting specific areas, but their effectiveness depends on more than just the antioxidant itself. The formulation has to keep the ingredient stable and help it penetrate the skin, and any benefits are generally limited to the areas where you apply the product.11
Oral antioxidants from foods or supplements take a more indirect route. They're absorbed through the digestive system and distributed through the bloodstream before they can reach the skin.12 That means they aren't limited to one application area and may potentially benefit skin throughout the body, but they first have to be absorbed and reach the skin in sufficient amounts.
Antioxidants aren't a single class of nutrients or compounds. Vitamins, plant compounds, naturally occurring pigments, and even substances your body makes on its own can all have antioxidant activity. Several types have been studied for skin health, so here's a quick introduction to the ones you're most likely to encounter.
Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin that your skin naturally contains. In addition to acting as an antioxidant, it's needed to make collagen, the protein that helps give skin its structure and firmness.13 That combination helps explain why vitamin C has become such a common ingredient in products aimed at skin aging. You'll most often see it in topical serums, though you can also get vitamin C through food and supplements.
Vitamin E is a fat-soluble vitamin and antioxidant that helps protect fats in the skin from oxidative damage.14 In skin care, you'll often see it paired with vitamin C because the two antioxidants can work together — vitamin E helps protect fatty parts of cells, while vitamin C can help restore vitamin E after it has neutralized a free radical. “Vitamin E” actually refers to a family of related compounds rather than a single substance.
Carotenoids are naturally occurring pigments responsible for many of the yellow, orange, and red colors you see in foods and other organisms. Beta-carotene and lycopene are two familiar examples, but this family also includes astaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin — three antioxidants you'll see elsewhere in this guide.
Unlike vitamins C and E, which you can find in both supplements and plenty of skin care products, carotenoids are particularly interesting as dietary antioxidants because they can be absorbed and accumulate in the skin. Researchers have studied several of them for their potential to help the skin handle oxidative stress and UV exposure.15
Polyphenols are a huge family of naturally occurring plant compounds. You probably consume some of them already without thinking about it: flavanols, for example, are found abundantly in cocoa, while resveratrol occurs naturally in foods such as grapes and berries.
Many polyphenols have antioxidant activity, which has made them an interesting area of skin research. But because “polyphenol” describes such a large group, it doesn't tell us whether a particular compound will benefit your skin — that depends on the individual polyphenol and the evidence behind it.16
CoQ10 is a little different from the vitamins and plant compounds above because your body makes it on its own. It helps your cells produce energy while also serving as an antioxidant, and it's naturally present in your skin.17 Skin levels appear to decline with age and environmental stress, which is one reason researchers have become interested in whether adding CoQ10 through topical products or supplements could be beneficial.
Antioxidants have been studied for a range of potential skin benefits, from helping protect against UV-related damage to improving visible signs of aging. But different antioxidants have different strengths, and the evidence is considerably better for some benefits than others.
Certain antioxidants may help your skin stand up a little better to UV exposure. A recent meta-analysis found that people taking oral flavanols could tolerate more UV exposure before their skin developed visible redness — essentially showing greater resistance to one measurable effect of UV damage. Results varied considerably among studies, but the overall finding was significant.18
Astaxanthin has shown similar potential. In one randomized trial, people taking it needed more UV exposure to develop visible redness and also experienced less moisture loss after UV exposure than those taking a placebo.19 That's encouraging, but it's important to put these findings in perspective: antioxidants can provide an additional layer of protection, but they don't block UV rays and aren't a substitute for sunscreen.
Antioxidants may also help with some of the changes we typically associate with aging skin. A systematic review of topical vitamin C found that treated skin appeared smoother and less wrinkled.2
There are promising results for oral antioxidants, too. In a 24-week randomized trial, women taking cocoa flavanols experienced improvements in both facial wrinkles and skin elasticity compared with placebo.5 Astaxanthin has also performed well when researchers have looked at elasticity, with a meta-analysis finding a significant improvement compared with placebo.20 In practical terms, better elasticity means skin is better able to return to its original shape after being stretched or moved.
Astaxanthin has some of its strongest evidence in this area. A meta-analysis of randomized trials found that oral astaxanthin significantly improved skin moisture compared with placebo.20 Individual research also suggests that it may help limit the moisture loss that can occur after UV exposure.19
That doesn't mean hydration is a benefit you can expect from every antioxidant. For example, the 24-week cocoa flavanol trial that found improvements in wrinkles and elasticity didn't find significant improvements in hydration or skin barrier function.5 Different antioxidants appear to have different strengths, which is one reason we don't consider them interchangeable.
Topical vitamin C may be particularly useful if uneven pigmentation is one of your concerns. A systematic review found significant lightening of vitamin C-treated skin in studies that objectively measured pigmentation.2 This fits with vitamin C's ability to interfere with melanin production, the process responsible for skin pigmentation.
Evidence for this benefit isn't as well established for many of the oral antioxidants studied for skin. So while oral antioxidants may have advantages elsewhere, pigmentation is one area where topical vitamin C has a particularly good case.
For most healthy adults, the antioxidants covered in this guide appear to have relatively good safety profiles. The main thing to keep in mind is that topical products and oral supplements come with different considerations.
With topical antioxidants, irritation is usually the biggest concern. Vitamin C products are generally well tolerated, but L-ascorbic acid — the form used in SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic and Maelove Glow Maker — is typically formulated at a low pH to help it penetrate the skin. That acidity can cause stinging, burning, or irritation, particularly if you have sensitive skin.21 Starting gradually and testing a small area first can help you see how your skin responds.
Oral antioxidants require a little more consideration because they're absorbed and distributed throughout the body. Still, the ingredients in our recommendations have generally been well tolerated in human research. Astaxanthin has a particularly reassuring safety record: a review of 87 human studies found no safety concerns with natural astaxanthin, including 35 studies using doses of 12mg or more per day.22
That doesn't mean supplements are risk-free. If you're pregnant or breastfeeding, take prescription medications, or have a medical condition, it's a good idea to check with your healthcare provider before adding a new supplement. And whether you're using a topical or oral antioxidant, stop using it and seek medical advice if you experience a significant or persistent reaction.
Antioxidants may be worth considering if you want to add another layer to a skin care routine that's already built around the basics, particularly sun protection. But whether a topical product or oral supplement makes more sense depends on what you're looking for.
Neither approach is essential for healthy skin, and antioxidants shouldn't take priority over proven basics like sunscreen. But if you already have those fundamentals covered, certain antioxidants may offer some additional benefits.
Antioxidants are an option for many people, but certain products may not be a good fit depending on your skin, medications, or other circumstances. In some cases, choosing a different type of antioxidant may make more sense than avoiding them altogether.
Topical vitamin C can cause stinging, burning, or irritation, particularly when you're using L-ascorbic acid in the acidic formulas needed to help it penetrate the skin.21 If your skin is especially sensitive, that doesn't necessarily mean antioxidants are off the table. You may want to start slowly, patch test new products, consider a gentler vitamin C derivative, or choose an oral antioxidant instead.
We don't have enough research to confidently say that supplements such as astaxanthin or concentrated cocoa flavanols are safe during pregnancy or breastfeeding. That doesn't necessarily mean they're unsafe, but we'd recommend checking with your healthcare provider before taking them specifically for skin health.
If you take a blood thinner or have a bleeding disorder, talk with your healthcare provider before adding an oral antioxidant supplement. Human research suggests cocoa flavanols can affect platelet activity, which plays a role in blood clotting.23 There's also a published case report of a possible interaction between astaxanthin and warfarin.24 Neither finding establishes that these supplements will cause bleeding, but there's enough reason to be cautious.
Best overall oral supplement

Photo by Innerbody Research
If you’re looking for an oral antioxidant solely for skin, we consider CocoaVia to be the best under most circumstances, largely because of the evidence behind cocoa flavanols. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 randomized controlled trials found that flavanols were among the oral supplements showing benefits for skin photoaging.18 Researchers have studied them for several outcomes that matter here, including how skin responds to UV exposure, wrinkles, elasticity, hydration, and blood flow.5 18 25
Two cocoa studies in particular caught our attention:
CocoaVia provides 500mg of cocoa flavanols per two-capsule serving, putting it in the same general range as the amounts used in these skin studies. The product also uses Cocoapro, Mars's proprietary cocoa extract. Cocoapro itself has been used in human research, including a clinical safety trial that used capsules containing 500mg of cocoa flavanols from Cocoapro extract.26
That's not the same as testing the finished CocoaVia capsules for skin benefits. But between the broader evidence for flavanols, multiple cocoa-specific skin trials, and a dose that lines up well with the research, CocoaVia makes a particularly strong case among the oral antioxidants we considered.
We also like CocoaVia's attention to quality. Its capsules are certified by NSF Contents and the Clean Label Project, as well as Non-GMO Project Verified and certified vegan.
One small consideration is caffeine. Each serving contains about 25mg — relatively little compared with a cup of coffee, but something to keep in mind if you're particularly sensitive to it.
CocoaVia is relatively expensive for a daily supplement, although subscribing makes the cost a little more manageable.
| Price | Servings | Cost per serving | |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-time purchase | $48.99 | 30 | $1.63 |
| Monthly subscription | $43.99 | 30 | $1.47 |
| 3-month subscription | $124.99 | 90 | $1.39 |
A monthly subscription saves 10%, while receiving three bottles every 90 days saves 15% and brings the effective price down to $41.66 per bottle. Subscriptions can be modified or canceled at any time, and CocoaVia currently provides free U.S. shipping.
CocoaVia offers a generous 100-day money-back guarantee. That's considerably longer than the 30-day return window you get with Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+, our other oral recommendation, and gives you more time to decide whether CocoaVia is worth the ongoing cost.
If it doesn't work out for you, you can return the unused portion within 100 days for a refund of the product cost. Shipping and handling aren't refundable, although CocoaVia currently provides free U.S. shipping on this product.
Best low-priced oral supplement

Photo by Innerbody Research
Innerbody Labs Astaxanthin+ is our best low-cost oral antioxidant because it gives you three carotenoids — astaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin — for less than $1 per day. Carotenoids are particularly interesting for skin because, after you consume them, they can accumulate in the skin and help strengthen its antioxidant defenses.15
Astaxanthin is doing most of the heavy lifting here, but lutein and zeaxanthin make this a more comprehensive carotenoid formula than the typical standalone astaxanthin supplement.
Each softgel provides 12mg of astaxanthin, a dose that sits at the upper end of amounts used in human skin research.27 A meta-analysis of randomized trials found that oral astaxanthin significantly improved skin moisture and elasticity compared with placebo.20 Another trial found that it helped protect against UV-related redness and moisture loss.19
Astaxanthin+ adds 10mg of lutein and 2mg of zeaxanthin, two closely related carotenoids that can accumulate in the skin. A randomized controlled trial using these same amounts found improvements in overall skin tone and increased the amount of UV exposure needed to produce visible redness.28
There's a benefit beyond skin, too. Lutein and zeaxanthin are particularly well studied for eye health, and the 10mg/2mg combination is the same one used in the landmark AREDS2 trial. That large NIH-sponsored study helped establish lutein and zeaxanthin as important components of a supplement formula designed to slow the progression of age-related macular degeneration in people at high risk.29 We go much deeper into that research in our guide to the best lutein and zeaxanthin supplements.
Innerbody Labs uses AstaPure, a natural astaxanthin extract derived from Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae using supercritical CO₂ extraction. That's a plus in our book: the process avoids the solvents used in some conventional extraction methods, reducing concerns about residual solvents while helping preserve the astaxanthin. And because all three carotenoids are fat-soluble, the softgel includes MCT oil as a fat source to support their absorption.
We also like Innerbody Labs' approach to testing. Every batch undergoes third-party testing for identity, potency, heavy metals, pesticides, and microbial contaminants, with batch-specific Certificates of Analysis published online.
Full transparency: The Innerbody Labs supplement brand is a division of our company. We at Innerbody Research operate independently and evaluated Astaxanthin+ using the same criteria we apply to the other products in this guide.
At $28 for a 30-day supply, Astaxanthin+ keeps the cost below $1 per day, and subscriptions can bring it down to just $0.70.
| Total price | Cost per bottle | Cost per serving | Savings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-time purchase | $28.00 | $28.00 | $0.93 | N/A |
| Monthly subscription | $23.80 | $23.80 | $0.79 | 15% |
| Every 3 months | $67.20 | $22.40 | $0.75 | 20% |
| Every 6 months | $126.00 | $21.00 | $0.70 | 25% |
The six-month subscription offers the best value, lowering the cost to about $0.70 per daily serving. For comparison, we estimate that a daily application of SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic costs about $1.23-$1.54, making Astaxanthin+ roughly half the daily cost of our top topical pick.
The three- and six-month subscriptions also qualify for free shipping because their order totals exceed Innerbody Labs' $50 threshold. A one-time purchase or monthly subscription falls below that threshold and currently incurs a $6.99 shipping charge.
Innerbody Labs gives you 30 days from receiving your order to initiate a return, and opened or partially used products are eligible. We like that flexibility because it means you can actually try Astaxanthin+ without losing your ability to return it.
The 30-day window is considerably shorter than CocoaVia’s 100-day guarantee, however, and you’ll be responsible for return shipping.
Best topical

Photo by Innerbody Research
SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic is our top topical antioxidant — and, from an evidence standpoint, the strongest product in this guide. Its advantage isn't simply that it contains vitamin C. The form, concentration, and combination of antioxidants all line up unusually well with the clinical research.
L-Ascorbic acid is the best-studied form of topical vitamin C, but it's also notoriously difficult to formulate. It's unstable and doesn't readily penetrate the skin unless the conditions are right.11 In foundational research led by SkinCeuticals founding scientist Sheldon Pinnell, L-ascorbic acid only entered the skin when formulations had a pH below 3.5, while absorption increased with concentration up to about 20%.30 SkinCeuticals uses 15% L-ascorbic acid, putting it comfortably within that research-backed range.
Vitamin C helps neutralize reactive oxygen species generated by UV exposure and other environmental stressors. It's also essential for collagen production, giving it relevance for both protecting skin and addressing visible signs of aging.6 13 A 2023 systematic review of seven clinical studies found that topical vitamin C improved wrinkling and pigmentation.2
These aren't just supporting ingredients. Vitamin E complements vitamin C's antioxidant activity, while ferulic acid helps stabilize both vitamins. In research using these concentrations, adding 0.5% ferulic acid to vitamins C and E doubled the combination's protection against UV-related skin damage.4
More importantly, researchers have tested this three-antioxidant combination in human skin. In a small clinical trial, the 15% vitamin C, 1% vitamin E, and 0.5% ferulic acid formula significantly reduced several signs of damage following simulated UV exposure, including redness, sunburn cells, inflammatory responses, and markers of DNA damage.3
There are some caveats. The study was supported by SkinCeuticals-L'Oréal, and Pinnell was a consultant for the company. The product has also changed since that research was published. Today's C E Ferulic retains the studied three-antioxidant core but adds 0.3% carnosine and 1% Endophytol, a dandelion-root-derived ingredient. That makes the study highly relevant to the current product, but not a clinical trial of the exact formula being sold today.
There's another tradeoff inherent to L-ascorbic acid: it can oxidize over time, reducing the amount of active vitamin C in the serum and potentially making it less effective. Ferulic acid improves the formula's stability, but it doesn't eliminate the problem.4 C E Ferulic can also darken after opening, although SkinCeuticals says that color change isn't necessarily a sign that the serum has lost its effectiveness. The company recommends using the product within three to six months after opening.
Taken together, that evidence is enough to earn C E Ferulic our top topical spot. It's expensive, but few topical antioxidants we evaluated have this level of research behind both their key ingredient and core formula.
C E Ferulic is a thin serum with a somewhat oily feel as you spread it across the skin. It also has a noticeable yellow color, making it visually quite different from the nearly clear Maelove serum and white Vanicream lotion. We found its scent more noticeable than either of those products, although it wasn't particularly strong or easy to identify. If you're sensitive to how skin care products smell, this is the one you're most likely to notice during application, but we didn't find the scent overwhelming.
There's no getting around C E Ferulic's biggest drawback: a 30mL bottle costs $185. That's more than five times the upfront price of Maelove Glow Maker, our budget topical pick.
SkinCeuticals recommends using 4-5 drops once each morning on the face, neck, and chest. Based on the amount dispensed per application, we estimate a bottle provides roughly 120-150 uses, putting the cost at approximately $1.23-$1.54 per application. Actual mileage will depend on how much you use and how large an area you cover.
A subscription saves 5%, bringing the price to about $175.75 per bottle, and you can schedule deliveries every one to six months. Subscription orders also ship free, which makes subscribing more worthwhile than the modest 5% discount alone might suggest.
If you buy C E Ferulic as a one-time purchase, standard shipping costs $8 unless your order reaches $250 — a notably high free-shipping threshold that the serum doesn't meet on its own.
SkinCeuticals accepts returns of products purchased directly from its website within 30 days of purchase, with no stated requirement that products be unopened or unused. The company provides a complimentary prepaid return label and refunds the full product price to your original payment method.
That's a much shorter window than Maelove's 100-day guarantee, but free return shipping is a nice perk given C E Ferulic's $185 price. Products purchased from a dermatologist, spa, or another retailer have to be returned through the original seller.
Best low-priced topical

Photo by Innerbody Research
Maelove Glow Maker is about as close as we found to getting the core appeal of SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic without paying $185. Like SkinCeuticals, it uses 15% L-ascorbic acid alongside vitamin E and ferulic acid, and Maelove formulates the serum at a pH of 3.1-3.4. That's important because research suggests L-ascorbic acid needs a pH below 3.5 to penetrate the skin effectively.30
That doesn't mean you're getting C E Ferulic in a cheaper bottle. Even when two serums use the same key antioxidants, differences in the overall formula, manufacturing, and stability can affect how well those ingredients work. Most importantly, Glow Maker itself doesn't have the peer-reviewed clinical evidence that gives SkinCeuticals our effectiveness advantage.
But there's good reason to think Glow Maker gets the important parts right. Its concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E, and ferulic acid closely match those used in clinical research.3 4 It also adds hyaluronic acid to support hydration, along with aloe, grape seed extract, and magnolia bark extract.
Like SkinCeuticals, Glow Maker also has to contend with vitamin C's tendency to oxidize, which can reduce its potency over time. Maelove recommends using the serum soon after receiving it and refrigerating unopened backup bottles to help keep them fresh.
Glow Maker is a thin, nearly clear serum that felt somewhat oily as we spread it across the skin. In that respect, it's much closer to SkinCeuticals than Vanicream, which has a creamier, lotion-like consistency. Maelove was less distinctive when it came to scent: we noticed very little overall, perhaps with a faint citrus-like note. Between its subtle smell and nearly clear appearance, there's relatively little about Glow Maker's sensory experience that we'd expect to be a dealbreaker.
Glow Maker costs $32.95 for a 30mL bottle, compared with $185 for the same amount of SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic.
That price difference is ultimately why Glow Maker earns our budget recommendation. You give up the product-specific peer-reviewed research behind SkinCeuticals, but Maelove gets many of the important formulation details right for less than one-fifth of the price.
You can also subscribe, though there's currently no subscription discount — the price remains $32.95. The main benefits are free shipping and convenience, with deliveries available every one to four months and the option to skip, pause, reschedule, or cancel as needed.
For one-time purchases, Maelove offers free U.S. shipping on orders of $50 or more. Since a single bottle of Glow Maker falls below that threshold, you'll pay $6.95 for shipping unless you add something else to your order.
Maelove backs Glow Maker with a 100-day money-back guarantee, giving you considerably more time than SkinCeuticals' 30-day return policy. If you're unhappy with the serum, you can return it within 100 days for a full refund, and Maelove covers return shipping.
That combination of a low upfront price and generous return policy makes Glow Maker particularly easy to try if you're interested in a C E Ferulic-style formula but aren't ready to spend $185.
Best topical for sensitive skin

Photo by Innerbody Research
Vanicream takes a different approach to vitamin C than SkinCeuticals and Maelove. Instead of L-ascorbic acid, it uses 5% tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate (THD ascorbate), a fat-soluble vitamin C derivative. That difference comes with a tradeoff, but it's also the main reason Vanicream makes sense for sensitive skin.
L-Ascorbic acid has by far the stronger clinical track record.2 6 But it's a challenging ingredient to formulate. It oxidizes readily, which can reduce its potency over time, and it generally needs a pH below 3.5 to penetrate the skin effectively.11 30 That acidity can also cause stinging and irritation, particularly for sensitive skin.21
THD ascorbate takes a different route. Its fat-soluble structure is intended to help it move through the skin's lipid-rich outer layer, and unlike L-ascorbic acid, it doesn't require the same low-pH environment. Once in the skin, THD ascorbate can be converted to active vitamin C.31 In theory, that makes it an appealing way to deliver vitamin C without relying on a highly acidic formula.
The tradeoff is evidence. THD ascorbate hasn't been studied nearly as extensively as L-ascorbic acid. A small clinical trial found improvements in photoaged skin from a formula containing THD ascorbate, but that product also contained 10% L-ascorbic acid, so we can't tell how much THD contributed.32 And in a 2024 trial, 5% THD ascorbate alone — the same concentration Vanicream uses — produced little improvement in pigmentation and didn't improve wrinkles or redness over eight weeks.31
That's why we see Vanicream as an alternative rather than a replacement for SkinCeuticals or Maelove. If your skin tolerates L-ascorbic acid well, we'd favor one of those formulas because the evidence is considerably stronger. But if acidic vitamin C serums leave your skin stinging, red, or irritated, Vanicream offers a potentially gentler way to incorporate topical vitamin C.
The rest of the serum follows the same sensitive-skin logic. Vanicream includes five ceramides to help support the skin barrier, plus glycerin and phytosterols for additional moisturizing support. It also skips fragrance, essential oils, botanical extracts, and dyes, reducing some potential sources of irritation.
The packaging is another plus. An airless pump limits how much air reaches the serum each time you use it, helping protect the formula from unnecessary exposure between applications.
Vanicream looks and feels quite different from the other two topical antioxidants we tested. Rather than a thin serum, it's white and creamy, with a lotion-like consistency that reminded us somewhat of sunscreen. That makes it feel more like a conventional moisturizing skin care product than the somewhat oily SkinCeuticals and Maelove serums. We also noticed very little scent, making Vanicream the most neutral of the three in that respect — another small advantage if strong-smelling skin care products tend to bother you.
Vanicream doesn't sell the serum directly, so pricing and shipping depend on where you buy it. At the time of writing, Amazon sells the 1.2oz (35mL) bottle for $17.97, making it the least expensive topical antioxidant in our lineup.
Retailer subscriptions may also be available. Amazon, for example, offers Subscribe & Save for this product, though the savings can vary. Since Vanicream doesn't sell directly, subscription discounts, shipping costs, and delivery options ultimately depend on the retailer you choose.
Because Vanicream doesn't sell the serum directly, there's no company-wide return policy or money-back guarantee. Instead, your return window — including whether you can return an opened bottle — depends on the retailer where you buy it.
That's less predictable than our other topical picks. Maelove offers a 100-day money-back guarantee with free return shipping, while SkinCeuticals accepts returns within 30 days and provides a prepaid return label. Vanicream's much lower price makes the lack of a standardized guarantee less consequential, but it's still worth checking your retailer's policy before buying.
Antioxidants don't need to make your skin care routine complicated. If you're using a topical antioxidant such as vitamin C:
Sunscreen should still be the final step in your morning routine. Antioxidants can add another layer of protection against UV-related damage, but they don't replace it.
Oral antioxidants are simpler: take the recommended dose consistently. Most of the clinical research we've discussed involved daily supplementation over several weeks or months, so these aren't products we'd expect to produce meaningful skin changes overnight.5 19 20
You can also use topical and oral antioxidants together. They reach the skin in different ways, so taking cocoa flavanols or astaxanthin doesn't prevent you from using a vitamin C serum as well. But you don't need both — either approach can be reasonable depending on your goals and the kind of routine you prefer.
Antioxidants aren't the only supplements with evidence for supporting skin health. If your main goal is improving wrinkles, hydration, or elasticity rather than increasing antioxidant protection specifically, some alternatives may make as much — or more — sense.
Collagen supplements take a different approach from antioxidants. Rather than primarily helping defend against oxidative stress, hydrolyzed collagen provides peptides and amino acids that may support the skin's extracellular matrix and stimulate processes involved in collagen production.
The evidence here is fairly substantial. A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 1,721 participants found that hydrolyzed collagen supplementation significantly improved both skin hydration and elasticity compared with placebo.33
That makes collagen particularly interesting if dryness or loss of elasticity is your primary concern. The evidence isn't perfect — the researchers identified potential biases among the included studies and called for larger trials — but collagen has enough human research behind it to be a legitimate alternative rather than simply another popular beauty supplement.
Dietary fats play structural roles in the skin and can influence its barrier function, hydration, and inflammatory response, making them fundamentally different from the antioxidants we've focused on throughout this guide.
A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary interventions found that lipid and fatty-acid interventions significantly improved wrinkles, hydration, and skin elasticity.34 The specific fats, doses, and study designs varied, however, so this evidence doesn't translate into one universally effective omega-3 dose for skin.
Fatty-acid supplements may therefore make more sense if dryness and skin-barrier support are priorities, particularly if your diet is low in sources of unsaturated fats. If you’re interested in adding omega-3s, our guides to the best fish oil supplements and best vegan omega-3 supplements take a closer look at your options.
Probiotics may also have a role in skin health. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis found that prebiotic and probiotic supplementation significantly improved skin hydration, although the evidence for other measures of skin aging was less consistent.34
The benefits likely depend on the specific strains and formulations used, however, so we wouldn't expect every probiotic supplement to produce the same results.
Supplements can provide concentrated doses of individual antioxidants, but you can get many of the same compounds through food. Vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids, and polyphenols are all found naturally in the diet, and research shows that some of these antioxidants are absorbed and ultimately make their way into the skin.12
You don't need to follow a specialized “anti-aging diet” to take advantage of them. A varied diet rich in plant foods can provide a broad mix of antioxidants along with fats, protein, and other nutrients your skin needs to function normally.10 12
Some particularly useful foods include:
We also have some evidence connecting what people eat with how their skin ages. In a study of more than 4,000 middle-aged American women, higher dietary vitamin C intake was associated with a lower likelihood of wrinkles and age-related dryness, while higher intake of linoleic acid, an essential omega-6 fatty acid, was associated with less dryness and skin thinning.35 This was an observational study, so it can't tell us that either nutrient caused those differences, but it does suggest that overall diet matters.
And we don't have to rely entirely on associations. In a randomized controlled feeding trial, researchers changed participants' carotenoid intake using different amounts of fruits and vegetables and found corresponding changes in carotenoid levels measured in their skin.36 In other words, at least some of the antioxidants you eat really do reach your skin.
Sources
Innerbody uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Flament, F., Bazin, R., Laquieze, S., Rubert, V., Simonpietri, E., & Piot, B. (2013). Effect of the sun on visible clinical signs of aging in Caucasian skin. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 6, 221–232.
Correia, G., & Magina, S. (2023). Efficacy of topical vitamin C in melasma and photoaging: A systematic review. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 22(7), 1938–1945.
Murray, J. C., Burch, J. A., Streilein, R. D., Iannacchione, M. A., Hall, R. P., & Pinnell, S. R. (2008). A topical antioxidant solution containing vitamins C and E stabilized by ferulic acid provides protection for human skin against damage caused by ultraviolet irradiation. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 59(3), 418–425.
Lin, F.-H., Lin, J.-Y., Gupta, R. D., Tournas, J. A., Burch, J. A., Selim, M. A., Monteiro-Riviere, N. A., Grichnik, J. M., Zielinski, J., & Pinnell, S. R. (2005). Ferulic acid stabilizes a solution of vitamins C and E and doubles its photoprotection of skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 125(4), 826–832.
Yoon, H.-S., Kim, J. R., Park, G. Y., Kim, J.-E., Lee, D. H., Lee, K. W., & Chung, J. H. (2016). Cocoa flavanol supplementation influences skin conditions of photo-aged women: A 24-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The Journal of Nutrition, 146(1), 46–50.
Al-Niaimi, F., & Chiang, N. Y. Z. (2017). Topical vitamin C and the skin: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 10(7), 14–17.
Baek, J., & Lee, M.-G. (2016). Oxidative stress and antioxidant strategies in dermatology. Redox Report, 21(4), 164–169.
Dunaway, S., Odin, R., Zhou, L., Ji, L., Zhang, Y., & Kadekaro, A. L. (2018). Natural antioxidants: Multiple mechanisms to protect skin from solar radiation. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, Article 392.
Pillai, S., Oresajo, C., & Hayward, J. (2005). Ultraviolet radiation and skin aging: Roles of reactive oxygen species, inflammation and protease activation, and strategies for prevention of inflammation-induced matrix degradation – a review. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 27(1), 17–34.
Fernández-García, E. (2014). Skin protection against UV light by dietary antioxidants. Food & Function, 5(9), 1994–2003.
Stamford, N. P. J. (2012). Stability, transdermal penetration, and cutaneous effects of ascorbic acid and its derivatives. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 11(4), 310–317.
Richelle, M., Sabatier, M., Steiling, H., & Williamson, G. (2006). Skin bioavailability of dietary vitamin E, carotenoids, polyphenols, vitamin C, zinc and selenium. British Journal of Nutrition, 96(2), 227–238.
Michels, A. J. (2011). Vitamin C and skin health. Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University.
Keen, M. A. (2012). Vitamin E and skin health. Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University.
Ma, Y., Li, C., Su, W., Sun, Z., Gao, S., Xie, W., Zhang, B., & Sui, L. (2025). Carotenoids in skin photoaging: Unveiling protective effects, molecular insights, and safety and bioavailability frontiers. Antioxidants, 14(5), Article 577.
Ratz-Łyko, A., & Arct, J. (2019). Resveratrol as an active ingredient for cosmetic and dermatological applications: A review. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 21(2), 84–90.
Lain, E. T., Agrawal, N., Ruvolo, E., Weise, J. M., & Callender, V. D. (2024). The role of coenzyme Q10 in skin aging and opportunities for topical intervention: A review. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 17(8), 50–55.
Yang, Q., Li, H., Zhang, H., Ma, L., Zhang, X., & Wu, J. (2025). Effectiveness of dietary supplements for skin photoaging in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, Article 1582946.
Ito, N., Seki, S., & Ueda, F. (2018). The protective role of astaxanthin for UV-induced skin deterioration in healthy people—A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients, 10(7), Article 817.
Zhou, X., Cao, Q., Orfila, C., Zhao, J., & Zhang, L. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of astaxanthin on human skin ageing. Nutrients, 13(9), Article 2917.
Farris, P. K. (2005). Topical vitamin C: A useful agent for treating photoaging and other dermatologic conditions. Dermatologic Surgery, 31(7 Pt 2), 814–817.
Brendler, T., & Williamson, E. M. (2019). Astaxanthin: How much is too much? A safety review. Phytotherapy Research, 33(12), 3090–3111.
Peluso, I., Palmery, M., & Serafini, M. (2015). Effect of cocoa products and flavanols on platelet aggregation in humans: A systematic review. Food & Function, 6(7), 2128–2134.
Santiyanon, N., & Yeephu, S. (2019). Interaction between warfarin and astaxanthin: A case report. Journal of Cardiology Cases, 19(5), 173–175.
Heinrich, U., Neukam, K., Tronnier, H., Sies, H., & Stahl, W. (2006). Long-term ingestion of high flavanol cocoa provides photoprotection against UV-induced erythema and improves skin condition in women. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(6), 1565–1569.
Ottaviani, J. I., Balz, M., Kimball, J., Ensunsa, J. L., Fong, R., Momma, T. Y., Kwik-Uribe, C., Schroeter, H., & Keen, C. L. (2015). Safety and efficacy of cocoa flavanol intake in healthy adults: A randomized, controlled, double-masked trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 102(6), 1425–1435.
Tominaga, K., Hongo, N., Fujishita, M., Takahashi, Y., & Adachi, Y. (2017). Protective effects of astaxanthin on skin deterioration. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, 61(1), 33–39.
Juturu, V., Bowman, J. P., & Deshpande, J. (2016). Overall skin tone and skin-lightening-improving effects with oral supplementation of lutein and zeaxanthin isomers: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 9, 325–332.
Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group. (2013). Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 309(19), 2005–2015.
Pinnell, S. R., Yang, H., Omar, M., Monteiro-Riviere, N., DeBuys, H. V., Walker, L. C., Wang, Y., & Levine, M. (2001). Topical L-ascorbic acid: Percutaneous absorption studies. Dermatologic Surgery, 27(2), 137–142.
Afzal, N., Nguyen, N., Min, M., Egli, C., Afzal, S., Chaudhuri, R. K., Burney, W. A., & Sivamani, R. K. (2024). Prospective randomized double-blind comparative study of topical acetyl zingerone with tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate versus tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate alone on facial photoaging. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23(7), 2467–2477.
Fitzpatrick, R. E., & Rostan, E. F. (2002). Double-blind, half-face study comparing topical vitamin C and vehicle for rejuvenation of photodamage. Dermatologic Surgery, 28(3), 231–236.
Pu, S.-Y., Huang, Y.-L., Pu, C.-M., Kang, Y.-N., Hoang, K. D., Chen, K.-H., & Chen, C. (2023). Effects of oral collagen for skin anti-aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients, 15(9), Article 2080.
Ng, J. Y., Ng, X. M. G. Y., Wong, Q. Y. A., & Chew, F. T. (2025). Dietary interventions in skin ageing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 44(1), Article 26.
Cosgrove, M. C., Franco, O. H., Granger, S. P., Murray, P. G., & Mayes, A. E. (2007). Dietary nutrient intakes and skin-aging appearance among middle-aged American women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86(4), 1225–1231.
Ahn, S., Hwang, J.-E., Kim, Y. J., Eom, K., Jung, M. H., Moon, H., Ham, D., Park, J. M., Oh, S. U., Park, J.-Y., & Joung, H. (2024). Examination of the utility of skin carotenoid status in estimating dietary intakes of carotenoids and fruits and vegetables: A randomized, parallel-group, controlled feeding trial. Nutrition, 119, Article 112304.